A quick round-up of results in the 2016 presidential nominating contests is followed by a discussion of the stop Trump movement, which is a segue way into clearing up some of the terms being thrown around in commentary on the election — specifically, socialism, communism, fascism, and populism. Excerpts include audio from the usual suspects — Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders — as well as audio footage of Texas governor Pappy O’Daniel.
Hosts
Eric McDanielAssociate Professor in the Department of Government at the University of Texas at Austin
Jim HensonDirector of the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin
In the news.
Look, now the news for American in Texas government. I’m Eric McDaniel. And I’m Jim Henson. Well,
this we’ve been off for for a week, I guess, enjoying spring break, a little bit of south by Southwest,
which a hard to see President Obama speak. I got to see the president speak. It was a was a day long investment.
It’s I think the third time I’d seen him actually go, wow, OK. But I guess and I don’t know, it makes me like Obama
ahead. I didn’t travel anywhere, so. Yeah. No, he was you know, it was interesting.
He made some news by talking about the the Apple case and the Justice Department for the first time.
So, you know, a receptive crowd. Interesting. Seeing him play technology leaders
was part of South by Southwest Interactive. So a good time, but almost like going to a rock
show. All right, good. I mean, you got out, did something educational. I binged. Watch Daredevil.
So you have two different four hour an episode seven. OK. You get six more to go. It’s
good. But but. But they actually in the news. I don’t think my
TV watching is actually that important. We saw the primary going on. And so we have results from
the Democratic primary. So we see in Arizona
that Hillary Clinton won in Arizona. They’re still doing the final counts of the delegate count
may change a bit. But you see that Bernie Sanders won in Utah,
but Hillary Clinton won in Idaho. One thing I should say is I think I got a slide with that back, one of those
slides backwards. And so Sanders won in Idaho and Utah. Oh,
OK. So I’m going to take the hit on that. That’s the late night slide slide work. Don’t
worry about it. I’ve been there. Now, what’s important to note is that the
the news A Bernie won this state. Hillary won this state. It’s very important point to really
understand is that the states are weighted differently. So it’s not the same as all because, again, population
matters. And that’s why, you know, Bernie Sanders could win two or three states, but still
trailing Hillary Clinton or maybe even lose some of his
BBB behind the pace of Hillary Clinton because the states he won were small. Two states he won are small. But the ones
that Hillary Clinton won was very large. And that’s why the Michigan win was so important, because he won a large
state. But if you look at the current delegate count, Hillary Clinton still has, you
know, more than a three or to delegate lead. So, again, 57
percent to 43 percent. So clearly, it was a lot of ground
that Bernie Sanders needs to make up. And actually some senators have said, you know, go ahead, it’s time to throw
in the towel. Call it quits. And instead, it’s attacking Hillary, start attacking Trump.
And so the Democratic Party can get focused on the general election. Yeah. And I think you’ve seen some subtle signs
from Sanders that, you know, there have always been bounds, but many more bounds
in the court to the conflict between these two. Sanders has been taking it a little bit easier,
I think. I think they realize they know that there is an outcome here. They can’t say
that. So that race has been a little bit more bound, but that that talk is going to continue
to get much more pronounced as as Hillary Clinton’s delegate count
increases. We saw a interesting night on the Republican side as again, probably
a little bit more interesting, because that’s the way these things have been going in this race. Donald Trump
won big in Arizona. Not not a big surprise given his emphasis on
immigration and the way that that debate has played out in Arizona. He was
Trump was endorsed by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, as we’ve discussed in here before.
And but Ted Cruz then won big in Utah by a very large
margin in the in the couple of weeks running up to this Trump, it essentially ceded Utah
by alienating Mormons. He took a shot at Mitt Romney is being
questioned whether Romney was a was a Mormon and typical Trump style. He was doing it in kind of a joking
way. He was trying to say that all the Mormons he knew were smart. And so then he quipped,
well, maybe Mitt Romney is not a Mormon, huh? But what really got picked up was just him saying that Romney
wasn’t a Mormon. I think more, you know, more and more importantly for the
Trump campaign. Trump’s general cultural demeanor has
not played well in Utah and has not played well among Mormons. Many Mormons, in fact,
do missionary work around the world. And so much of that happens in Latin America. And
so Utah in general has not been as prone to the anti-immigrant
impulses that Trump has played on so well. So if we go and we look at the general state of that race
after last night, then Trump’s the mark. You know, Trump is making progress
towards the majority threshold of 12:37. Cruz
is emerging as the clear alternative, but with
a much smaller bloc of delegates. So Trump. Point near sixty one percent
cruise that only about 30 percent of the delegates. Another kind of footnote to last night is that John
Cusack won no delegates in any of those contests. And so
in many ways, the bloom is off the rose after his big win in Ohio. That kind of propelled him back in the
race. And Rubio’s loss in Florida, which knocked him out. So that kind
of wraps up the races in a lot of ways. Yeah, Amy, K-6 should be bowing out soon. It’s really between
Trump and Cruz, and I believe they’re a bit of a twit Twitter war right now over,
I guess, some attacks on Trump’s wife. Rove’s definitely by
Cruz campaign, but by people linked to the Cruz campaign or Cruz supporters. And so this is
you know, this is getting really personal. And the problem is, the longer this plays out, the more this is going to hurt
the GOP in a general election because it’s going to end up doing is alienating a significant
number of voters. And so if you have Trump Trump, when you got people who are upset
about Trump, who don’t like Trump is if Trump loses, then those people are supporting Trump will feel
that he’d been cheated, that the party has cheated him in some way. And so it’s gonna be
there. And then there is the threat of a third party attempt. Yeah. You know, even among Republicans, Trump’s
negatives are very high. So Trump’s numbers on one hand have been moving up. And we’ve talked
in past weeks about how, you know, some of what some of the some of what the
Republican elites have been putting their hopes on had been the fact that Trump had not really been hitting
are creeping up in these elections as the field thins, but he’s still not winning
huge majorities. And this really has fueled a whole other round of what we think
of as a stop Trump movement among Republican elites. There was a on one hand,
there was a very high visibility meeting last weekend over
the end of last week, I guess conservatives, Republican elites, media figures
had a big meeting in D.C. trying to figure out how they could either stop
Trump or Orac or somehow replace him at the convention.
Somebody was mentioning that meeting to me, and that was a high visibility meeting. But
I think the Republicans are in a constant Republican elites are in a constant state of these conversations right
now. And it doesn’t really seem to be getting them anywhere. No, it doesn’t mean it’s.
And then this actually may actually help Trump a bit. He says, look, I’m anti-establishment and the establishment is
coming after me. And so when you when you actually formally CB establishment
coming after you, all of a sudden he’s no longer paranoid. So this may
this may actually help Trump more than it hurts him. Well, we’ll see how it all plays
out. Yeah, I think that’s right. I mean, you know, he’s he’s been masterful at using that opposition
as a virtue. I mean, something that Ted Cruz had been doing and Trump is now doing it.
Has turned it into an art. I think the other thing that that really fueled this movement last week
was this outbreak of violence at Trump rallies. So we’ve had a few incidents
of protesters being in a Trump rally and then somebody in the crowd essentially
punching them out as they’re being dragged out. Trump’s campaign manager, Corey
Lund Lewandowsky, has kind of manhandled a couple of people. It looks like some
of that has been captured on video. That’s not only fueled the opposition to Trump in
the sense that Trump is is is is an unusual kind of character
in American politics and potentially a dangerous one. And it’s fueled some of the
the tendency to think of Trump as dangerous in the sense of being a fascist, which kind
of brings us to our next topic. Yeah. I mean, you see that the anti Trump
stuff really pick up in Chicago. Then what? And then again, even Arizona is part of the worst example
of this. But one of the things that’s really important coming out of this is where you see this huge negative reaction
to Trump, but also the reactions to Bernie Sanders as well as really the names
and titles being thrown around. So you’ve seen discussions of fascist,
of socialist, populist. And these are Bear-Stearns being thrown around. But one of
the weird things about it, though, is they’re not really defining what the terms are. And so
they’ve it’s really important that we understand. What exactly does it mean to be a socialist,
to be a fascist? What is populism mean? What is it between a socialist and a communist? Because
all these things are kind of being thrown out there, but not really discussed. And that’s one of things we want
to highlight right now. Q What exactly does it mean to call somebody a socialist or
or a fascist? And so, you know, you could see if you
were one of the things about Trump that people have been talking about is that trying to label him as a as a fascist
is someone who ran a. Putting up Mussolini quotes and saying this is
Donald Trump said it and Donald Trump actually retweeted one of them was, oh, yeah. I said, there’s like no Mussolini
said this. If you’re not familiar with who Mussolini was, Masum leading was basically
the de facto dictator of Italy during World War 2. So it’s about the axis of evil.
It was under Mussolini’s reign. Mussolini was actually killed by the Italian people.
And that’s why Italy goes from supporting the Nazi Germany to opposing Nazi Germany in the middle
of World War 2. I’m amazed X remember all that good history teachers
in high school. But you know, we’re talking about this one. The first things to start
with, socialism. That’s what’s been really thrown around. Bernie Sanders Bernie Sanders actually identified himself as a socialist,
specifically a democratic socialist. So socialism is defined as a political and economic theory
of social organization that advocates the means of production, distribution and exchange
should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. So socialism is in many ways
thinking about co-ops, I guess things like that, where the community as a whole is a is part
of this. Now, what’s very important to understand is that this is different from communism.
They’re similar, but different. So communism is a political theory derived by
from Karl Marx advocating a class war and leading to a society which all property is
publicly owned. And each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs usually
are organized under a party led state. So communism, the real key
between communism and socialism is communism as a one party state. And this is where one
party state swarts risi a lot of oppression, but also a high level of corruption
as well. One party states. Again, as we talked about parties in the state of Texas from the Democratic Party
rule, the state of Texas, there’s a great deal of repression, but also a great deal of infighting and corruption
amongst the parties with socialism, democratic socialist. The parties are actually competing
with each other to see the direction of the nation. And so, you know, one primary example of a democratic
socialist, Martha King Junior, he was a democratic socialist, putting up democratic socialist nations. You have
Scandinavian nations where the communist nations would be the former USSR, Cuba, China,
North Korea. And in multi-party states, you have socialist parties that compete in elections
with, you know, more conventional conservative, non-socialist, non leftist parties.
Socialism and communism comes out of a more concrete kind of political tradition
that is really concerned with the kind of social justice. Equality is a fundamental value.
But the way that gets processed in American politics was really shaped by the experience of the Cold
War in the United States and the struggle versus the Soviet Union, which was the preeminent
communist state. And it’s interesting because the fragments of that era very much been in the news
this week because President Obama has been in Cuba trying to normalize relationships
and the process of normalizing relationship with one of the last Communist Party ruled states in the
world, Cuba. So pretty Sanders then
has thus found himself in a position, even though he described himself as a democratic socialist. Of having
to distinguish himself from somebody who might, you know,
very easily out of old habit, perhaps call him a communist. You’ve still seen some of that on the right. But even
from the left, some Democrats have been worried that were Sanders to get the nomination, the first thing
that would happen is that people would be calling him a communist. But let’s let’s roll a little sound, as Chuck Todd would say.
And Bernie, explain it for himself. So the next time that you hear and be
attacked as a socialist like tomorrow.
Remember this. I don’t believe government should take over.
You know, the grocery store down the street or own the means
of production. But I do believe that the middle class
and the working families of this country who produce the wealth
of this country deserve a decent standard of living
and that their incomes should go up, not down.
I do believe in private companies that thrive
and invest and grow in America. Companies
that create jobs here rather than companies that are shutting
down in America and increasing their profits by exploiting
low wage labor abroad.
I believe that most Americans can pay lower taxes
if hedge fund managers who make billions manipulating the marketplace
finally start paying the taxes that they should. OK, so Senator,
Senator Sanders does some lifting for us there. And I feel I better calm Senator Sanders. I kind of call them Bernie. It’s
a little overly familiar. Yes. Like I said, I want to see Barry a couple weeks ago.
OK. So but but one of the things that Senator Sanders does force there is
he really emphasizes that one of the things that is being distinguished is the role of the state and how
powerful the state is. And he clearly backs away from the communist model
of state control of all aspects of society or most of them. Now, that brings
us to this notion of fascism. And this is a label that’s been hurled, frankly, most
directly at Donald Trump. Now, the classic model of fascism differs from
as a as a political concept from socialism and communism, in that
it’s much less deeply rooted in a particular school of intellectual
thought and much more historical artifact. So when you think about fascism, we don’t think as much
of an ideology like we do with socialism or with communism. We think more about how
a political appeal was grafted on to particular political practices
in a in a in a historical period. So when we talk about fascism, which is generated really, as
Eric was saying, from the first real historical experience in Italy, Nazi Germany,
some states in the Balkans, we’re talking about political appeals that focus very
intensely on a narratives of community decline of national humiliation
or national victimhood and promising remedy through national unity.
The the the the focus of energy and purity on
a very purely conceived nation and national kind of very ethnic identity
in a lot of a lot of cases. And of course, for those of you that have even passing familiarity
with history, this should remind you, of course, of Nazi Germany. In fact, in
fascism, in practice, almost always calls for a mass based party of committed nationalist
militants. And what we mean by that are people that are focused on defending the nation and carrying
out the will of the political movement. This is typically very anti-democratic.
So in fascist regimes, the leadership and the followers, they abandon democratic
liberties and they and they pursue a kind of internal cleansing and national
rejuvenation, usually through the use of violence. And there’s
a kind of counter rational and counter ethical tone to how this happens
in these regimes. And then finally, fundamentally, they are led by an authoritarian,
often at least presumably charismatic leader. When you look back in history, it’s odd to look
at people like history at at like Hitler or Mussolini as care of the charismatic persay.
But in their time and place, they motivated people, they inspired them and they
and they and they lead people down a pretty dark path. So fascism
has been a term that people have hurled at Donald Trump. The other thing that we fear, the other political concept
that we’ve heard a lot this time, as Erick said earlier, is populism. And populism is
a different is a different kind of beast. So populism is is similar conceptually
to fight fascism in the sense that we talk about populism or really talked talking primarily
about a political appeal. And it’s in this appeal
is focused on standing up for the rights and the positions of common people
as opposed to the elite or the government. And so we’ve really seen that an
element of that in both Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders in the way
that they’re appealing to the welfare of the general population. We saw that in the Sanders
clip that we heard earlier with Bernie Sanders. We were talking earlier. It’s really focused
on struggling against Wall Street and the economic elite. But with Donald Trump, it’s
much more any intellectual. It’s about party elites. And it and it does have a much
stronger focus on national identity
with, you know, frankly, racial and ethnic overtones as nativist tone that we’ve talked to
about with Trump. So let’s let’s hear some sound from Trump and then we’ll come back and talk about it. We have losers.
We have losers. We have people that don’t have it. We have people that are morally corrupt.
We have people that are selling this country down the drain.
Our country is in serious trouble. We don’t have victories
anymore. We used to have victories, but we don’t have them. When was the last time
anybody saw us speeding, let’s say, China, in
a trade deal? They kill us. I beat China all the time,
all the time. When did we beat
Japan at anything? They send their cars over
by the millions. And why do we do? When was the last time
you saw a Chevrolet in Tokyo? It doesn’t exist, folks.
They beat us all the time. When do we beat Mexico
at the border? They’re laughing at us, at our stupidity. And now they’re beating us
economically. They are not our friend. Believe me. But they’re killing us economically.
The U.S. has become a dumping ground.
For everybody else’s problems. Well, I do have an answer the last time I saw a Chevrolet in Tokyo.
Fast and Furious Tokyo Drift. But I mean, if you
see it, you see for those two statements, you see the populism, the idea that people
are selling, selling America short. But then also this idea of a national shame. But when
is the last time we won? We’re losing. Other countries are laughing at us. And this is
this is a very important theme within this. And so what you have going on is Bernie Sanders
and his populism is Wall Street is cheating us with Donald Trump. It’s the
world is is against us. We need to kind of shore ourselves up. And there has been
some very strong kind of anti immigrant sentiment and the sense that these immigrants are coming in and
are ruining the nation. And so. And this is where you’re really getting this
this attack on on Trump. But again, there’s a very large segment of that within
the American public. And, you know, this is nothing new to the American public of getting people riled up
and let people kind of compared him to George Wallace
in the sense that he’s using kind of these ethnic and racial undertones to
mobilize support. Populism uses these racial and ethnic overtones
to gain support. And people actually argue that not doing this, you can actually lead to some bad,
bad decision making. But also the same thing with Senator Sanders, that by constantly blaming Wall Street.
Wall Street’s there for a reason. And so what they may do, some things we don’t dislike, but not completely
evil and completely corrupt. And the ideas, you know,
might need to work with Wall Street as time goes on. So both of them are taking these very strong
stances that can lead to greater divisiveness as opposed to actually, you know,
solving the problems at hand. And one thing we should say about populist regimes in other countries
and the instances of populism that we’ve frequently seen in the United States
is that there’s often not a lot of follow through. And that becomes one of you know, and that’s an artifact
of the fact that populism isn’t rooted in a very conc
typically in a very concrete political ideology or program. It’s all about
the appeal. So typically, if you’re a populist, once you get in power, the situation looks very
differently. And historically, we see populist typically compromising much more in power than
than we might expect from their rhetoric. And I think, you know, that’s that’s part of what,
you know, I think bothers people, particularly more classic conservatives about
populism, persay. Now, populism has its roots in different,
you know, different places in the country and in different places in the world. One interesting thing about Trump
very quickly is that he’s not the first celebrity populist that we’ve seen. And that has
been one of the things he’s been very distinctive about Donald Trump is that he’s populist, but he’s a rich guy, populist,
whose appeal was built on a national celebrity that came from television
and mass media. Texas had their own populist. The governor of Texas elected in
finish out. His second term was a guy named Pappy O’Daniel who had a radio show and
had his own kind of anti-communist populist emphasis. So let’s roll san with
upfrom on Pappy O’Daniel before we get out of here. I will not have time on this program to mention
any more of our accomplishment, and we’ll say that the record which I have just recited is not mine
alone. My brand or the humble pride which I have been privileged to play. I
am truly grateful, but the achievement of all things worthwhile in a land like
ours is based upon the full and great participation not of one man alone,
nor of a group of men, but of all of our people, or at least a majority of them living
together under the beneficent for of a government which they have MFL have for
working together under a system of society which guarantees to each and every one life,
liberty and opportunity, opportunity to leave, opportunity to succeed,
opportunity to attain great happiness. I am your governor, have been only a
symbol representing the desire and vision, hope and faith of
six and one half million good, honest and effective
caring in their heart. The treasure of pure old fashioned democracy
and faith in God. All right. Now, one things we do want to talk about before we
close out is the attack in Brussels yesterday. And this has become a very big issue.
This will become part of the campaign issue. Donald Trump in and took in.
Senator Ted Cruz of both kind of jumped into this with Senator Ted Cruz calling for, again, the
observation of Muslims increase, increasing that activity, saying, look, you know, I’ve heard about Islamophobia.
I don’t care about protecting the nation. I’ve already heard Donald Trump’s statements and kind of basically
on Muslims and Islam in relation to the US, and he kind of further
went into this. We’re going to hear more from probably Senator Sanders and former Secretary of
State Clinton is as time goes on, terms of their specific ideas towards this.
And so it’s going to be a really a big pressing issue within the campaign, because you’re seeing these attacks in Europe. And
it looks like, you know, this may become. People are fearful. This may become commonplace in Europe. Yet in
in in in the past, in this in this campaign cycle, Trump’s
interest in Trump has spiked actually in the wake of his response to Paris and to San
Bernardino. It’ll be interesting. See if that happens again. Yeah. So
that is all we have for this week. I know we went a bit long, but we had to make it make up for lost time. And in
closing, I want to say rest in peace, too. Five dog found a member of Beach
of a tribe called Quest. We will see you all next week. Want
to define fitness and we have the language ready.
He got more run on his family. He just wants to gain some type of
no shame in this place.
You want to justify it, but just do not know what.
The government 310 in the News podcast is hosted by doctors Jim Hansen and Eric McDaniel
and it’s produced by the Liberal Arts i.g.’s Development Studio and the Department of Government and the College
of Liberal Arts at the University of Texas at Austin.